Which approach best supports evaluating reading difficulties by using a range of evidence?

• A. Rely solely on a single standardized test
• B. Ignore student’s work samples
• C. Limit assessment to formal classroom grades
• D. Use multiple data sources including work samples and performance-based measures

Answer: (D)

Evaluating reading difficulties benefits from gathering information from multiple sources so you can see how a student reads in different contexts and tasks. A single standardized test gives a snapshot that may not reflect day-to-day performance or the specific skills a student uses or struggles with in real reading tasks. Work samples show how the student handles actual texts across genres, while performance-based measures assess reading skills as they appear in authentic activities, revealing strategies, fluency, decoding, and comprehension in action. Using a range of data sources, including work samples and performance-based measures, provides a fuller, more accurate picture and guides targeted instruction. Relying on one test, ignoring work samples, or limiting assessment to grades risks an incomplete view and weaker interventions.